I found about your initiative and I appreciate it, I
congratulate you ....
Here, in the world of joy there are
changes that lead to the disappearance of the routine, obsessive competitions
in which, together with a series of positive punctual qualities, develops many
different forms of negative personality (selfishness, vedetism, ignoring the
notion of fayre-play, abuse of maximal eforts vs.'age groups' ctg., etc.)
I, at the age of 83, still hope to
make known to you specialists of the day a new concept of practicing and
understanding of swimming. I formulated it and published it formally in 1983
and in 1999 I finished it ...(see CV)
I started my formula was stopped by
the unlack of accessories that allow counting of the movements (arms) but,
behold, in 2006, in the UK, fam. Irlam, managed to produce for the first time
the waterproof watch that allows the counting of rafts, and now I know that the
innovated concept of me in the 1983 World Heritage can become a reality, a
success.
Why do I support this ...?
Because in 1908 when FINA was
established, the first sentence of the Approved Statute concerned the intention
to help the sports swimming/club develop on a planetary level.
This has succeeded, the achievement
of such championships and glorious contests are proof that the swimming has
developed ... but, do you even ask 'planetary'
...?
That is, all people have the
opportunity (time / money, normal physical-biological possibilities, etc.) to
show that they, trying to practice swimming (FINA) have reached an elevated
stage of manifestation of their personality, so demonstrates, for example, the
famous Michael Phelps ....?
My concept refers to ALL people, regardless
of age, no matter what kind of bio-morpho-functional qualities (selection,
training), and especially regardless of the high degree, professional training,
less accessible to most people practicing swimming performance, well-sustained
scientific ...?
The truth is that your initiative
could rightfully trigger the FINA Status word = "the spread of practicing
sportive, efficient, planetary swimming".
In that sense, with the help of
'Google translate', I wrote this text, some phrases are not well translated,
but those interested can go over some grammatical or syntax formulas,
understanding the core of the problem ...
The text that follows is the date of
2010 ..:
Can it be
mathematically calculated, which is the Efficiency of the swimmer?
As a rule,
the performance, the timer, gives the real appreciation of an athlete's worth.
But sports swimming
has become so popular and has so many valences that a beginner's perspective
requires that he swim as fairly and efficiently as possible from the seson to
the secon.
Many coaches use only
the timer and plan different training formulas [volume, intensity, complexity];
often the effort so assessed is limited to how much fatigue has been overtaken
by the athlete?
But the one who
swims fairly, the technique of the contest process, demonstrates that
performance is not just what the timer shows [how to say] but also what it
looks like 'how did you solve' the confrontation between the demands of the
effort and the personal possibilities sport.
For example. -
Which is more effective between these two athletes: Both swim the same
distance, the same performance but one uses a smaller number of vans than the
other?
Me and many others
will say, logically, that the one who swims with fewer vans is more efficient.
Efficiency
Estimates would only be about counting vessels and so could even make another
ranking ... but Efficiency also depends on the somatic type of the Bottler; so
if they both swim the same way, and even have an equal number of vendors who
could be declared better, more efficient: - who is small and chubby or long and
thin?
So the efficiency
inside the 'art of swimming' is a dimension that becomes important and it would
be good for it to be objectively mathematically calculated.
I advocate for a
simple formula that can be mentally calculated at each training and not even at
'effective swimming' races, which will be different from those approved by FINA
- Rules.
The formula after
which the value of a swimmer can be calculated mathematically takes into
account the following data:
1.Time indicated by
the stopwatch over a given distance [usually 50m]
2. The number of
vans used ... and
3.The value of the
Personal Sliding Index [this index is quasi-constant, but different from the
swim to the swimmer]; By taking this constant value into account, we can do
strictly - an objective differentiation of what we mean by Swimming Efficiency.
Here's the formula
"The Biomechanical Efficiency Swimming Test / BEST"> PIG - [Time +
Tempo] = ..... points of Efficiency.
{{PIG is the value
resulting from the sum of the body weight on land, gathered with the number of
centimeters that measures the circus under the axillary of the chest (as the
tailor ...), the amount that will be deducted from the total length of the
swimmer's body stretched to the position floating horizontally-ventral}} for
example: The length is 210cm - [30 + 20] ... = 160 points
** Obs: PIG is very
necessary if mass races were organized with many swimmers, obviously different
like Biotip-somatic and the series could be organized perfectly equal to the
value PIG **
FINAL CONCLUSION:
From practical experience, it was noted that those who manage to swim as fast
as they can, using as few as possible ..., improve the technique (!!!), the
correctness of the swimming movements being the only way to Efficient Swimming
[this concept of Efficiency was generated by the meaning of an ancient aphorism
'slow fetish' ....
This is my CV:
No comments:
Post a Comment