Poate fi
calculata matematic, obiectiv care este 'Efficiency of'
..... inotatorului ?
De regula
performanta, cronometrul, dau aprecierea reala a valoarii unui
sportiv.
Dar inotul
sportiv a devenit atat de popular si are atatea valente incat pregatirea de
perspectiva a unui incepator cere ca acesta sa inoate cat mai corect si
eficient, de la seson la sezon.
Multi antrenori
se folosesc doar de cronometru si planifica diferite formule de antrenament
[volum, intensitate, complexitate]; de multe ori efortul astfel evaluat se
rezuma doar la 'cata oboseala a fost invinsa de sportiv'?
Dar cel care
inoata corect, tehnica procedeului de concurs, demonstreaza ca performanta nu
este egala doar cu ceea ce arata cronometrul [care 'spune' how] ci si de ceea
ce arata 'cum ai rezolvat' confruntarea intre cerintele efortului si
posibilitatile personale avute de sportiv.
De ex. - care
este mai eficient intre acesti doi sportivi :Amandoi inoata aceiasi distanta,
aceiasi performanta dar unul foloseste un numar mai mic de vasliri fata de
celalalt ?
Eu, si inca
multi altii vor spune, logic, ca cel care inoata cu mai putine vasliri este mai
Eficient.
Evaluarea
Eficientei s-ar rezuma doar la numararea vaslirilor si astfel s-ar putea face
chiar un alt clasament ..., dar Eficienta mai depinde si de
Biotipul-au somatic al celui care inoata; deci daca amandoi inotat la fel, si
chiar au un numar egal de vasliri cine ar putea fi declarat mai bun, mai
eficient:- cel care este mic si dolofan sau cel care este lung si subtire?
Deci Eficienta,
in interiorul 'artei de a inota' este o dimensiune care devine importanta si
bine ar fi ca ea sa fie calculata obiectiv, matematic.
Eu pledez pentru
o formula simpla, care poate fi calculata mental, la fiecare antrenament si, dece nu
chiar la intreceri de 'inot eficient', intreceri care vor fi diferite fata de
cele aprobate de FINA - Rules.
Formula dupa
care se poate calcula matematic valoarea Eficientei unui inotator are in vedere
urmatoarele date:
1.Time indicat
de cronometru pe o distanta data [ de regula pe 50m]
2. Numarul de
vasliri folosite... si
3.Valoarea
Indecelui Personal de Alunecare [ acest indice este cvazi-constant, dar diferit
la de inotator la inotator]; Introducand in calcul aceasta valoare constanta
vom putea face strict - o diferentiere obiectiva a ceea ce intelegem prin
Eficienta la inot.
Iata formula
"the Biomechanical Efficiency Swimming Test / BEST" > PIG - [Time
+ Tempo] = ..... points of Efficiency.
{{ PIG
reprezinta valoarea care rezulta din suma greutatii corporale pe uscat, adunata
cu numarul de centimetri care masoara circumefrinta sub axilara a toracelui (ca
la croitor...), suma care va fi scazuta din lungimnea totala a corpului
inotatorului intins in pozitia de plutire orizontal-ventrala}} de exemplu:
Lungimea este 210cm - [30+20] ...= 160 points
**Obs: PIG este
foarte necesar daca s-ar organiza intreceri de massa, cu multi inotatori,
evident diferiti ca Biotip-somatic iar seriile ar putea fi organizate perfect
egal dupa valoarea PIG**
CONCLUZIA
FINALA: din experienta practica, s-a remarcat, ca cei care reusesc sa inoate
cat pot ei de repede, folosind cat mai putine vasliri ..., ajung sa
perfectioneze tehnica (!!!), corectitudinea miscarilor de inot fiiind singura
cale de a inota Eficient
[ acest concept referitor la
Eficienta a fost generat de intelesul unui aforism antic 'Festina lente'...., adica 'Grabeste-te...incet' enuntat de Seutonius, carturar dins ec. II d.Ch.]
Can it
be mathematically calculated, which is the Efficiency of the swimmer?
As
a rule, the performance, the timer, gives the real appreciation of an athlete's
worth.
But
sports swimming has become so popular and has so many valences that a
beginner's perspective requires that he swim as fairly and efficiently as
possible from the seson to the secon.
Many
coaches use only the timer and plan different training formulas [volume,
intensity, complexity]; often the effort so assessed is limited to how much
fatigue has been overtaken by the athlete?
But
the one who swims fairly, the technique of the contest process, demonstrates
that performance is not just what the timer shows [how to say] but also what it
looks like 'how did you solve' the confrontation between the demands of the
effort and the personal possibilities sport.
For
example. - Which is more effective between these two athletes: Both swim the
same distance, the same performance but one uses a smaller number of vans than
the other?
Me and
many others will say, logically, that the one who swims with fewer vans is more
efficient.
Efficiency
Estimates would only be about counting vessels and so could even make another
ranking ... but Efficiency also depends on the somatic type of the Bottler; so
if they both swim the same way, and even have an equal number of vendors who
could be declared better, more efficient: - who is small and chubby or long and
thin?
So the
efficiency inside the 'art of swimming' is a dimension that becomes important
and it would be good for it to be objectively mathematically calculated.
I
advocate for a simple formula that can be mentally calculated at each training
and not even at 'effective swimming' races, which will be different from those
approved by FINA - Rules.
The
formula after which the value of a swimmer can be calculated mathematically
takes into account the following data:
1.Time
indicated by the stopwatch over a given distance [usually 50m]
2. The
number of vans used ... and
3.The
value of the Personal Sliding Index [this index is quasi-constant, but
different from the swim to the swimmer]; By taking this constant value into
account, we can do strictly - an objective differentiation of what we mean by
Swimming Efficiency.
Here's
the formula "The Biomechanical Efficiency Swimming Test / BEST">
PIG - [Time + Tempo] = ..... points of Efficiency.
{{PIG
is the value resulting from the sum of the body weight on land, gathered with
the number of centimeters that measures the circus under the axillary of the
chest (as the tailor ...), the amount that will be deducted from the total
length of the swimmer's body stretched to the position floating
horizontally-ventral}} for example: The length is 210cm - [30 + 20] ... = 160
points
**
Obs: PIG is very necessary if mass races were organized with many swimmers,
obviously different like Biotip-somatic and the series could be organized
perfectly equal to the value PIG **
FINAL
CONCLUSION: From practical experience, it was noted that those who manage to
swim as fast as they can, using as few as possible ..., improve the technique
(!!!), the correctness of the swimming movements being the only way to
Efficient Swimming [this concept of Efficiency was generated by the meaning of
an ancient aphorism 'slow fetish' ...in the world there can be no two kinds of
laws, occult laws, civic laws; only civic laws must be respected
dovada ca, la
inot, cu cat esti mai ''lung'' cu atat, mai imperios, este necesar sa
''aluneci''......
OBS: este ocazia
sa remarc ca acest clip accentueaza o ''teza'' de-a mea rezultata din Conceptul
BEST(1982)...; anume ca Eficienta unui inotator depinde de obtinerea unei
viteze cat mai mari cu un numar cat mai mic de vasliri, eficienta obtinuta, cel
mai frecvent de cei selectionati avand talia cat mai mare { IPA=Indicele
Personal de Alunecare... iar > BEST= IPA - (Time+Tempo), adica daca ai,
datorita taliei inalte, un coeficient IPA mare... poti calcula matematic,
mental ''eficienta'', scazand din valoare IPA suma (Timp+Tempo)}; Conceptul are
o vechime de cca 35 de ani, este publicat, de atunci in presa de specialitate
si sunt bucuros cand aud colegi care imi explica, in virtual, cum este treaba
asta cu alunecarea..... asa ca zicala > ""nimeni nu a ajuns profet
in sat la el...."" se confirma..., dovada ca singurul element
subiectiv al acestui concept (numararea vaslirilor) a fost rezolvat de firma
Swimovate (UK) printr-un watch-counter numit PoolMate care poate numara
obiectiv, electronic numarul de vasliri (stau si ma intreb...''chiar asa de
fraieri o fi fost Lisa Irlam si sotul ei sa investeasca cateva milioane bune de
lire in reusita asta, daca a numara vaslirile nu este ceva importanta pt
obtinerea eficientei?)..... O seara buna de tot....
proof
that when swimming, the longer you are, the more imperative it is necessary to
'' slip '' ......
OBS: I
have the opportunity to point out that this clip emphasizes my "my
thesis" resulting from the BEST Concept (1982) ...; namely that the
efficiency of a swimmer depends on getting as high a speed as possible with
fewer vessels, the efficiency gained, most often by the selected ones having
the largest size {IPA = Personal Index of Sliding ... and> BEST = IPA -
(Time + Tempo), that is, if you have a high IPA coefficient because of its high
waist ... you can calculate the mathematical, mental '' efficiency '',
decreasing from IPA sum amount (Time + Tempo)}; The concept is about 35 years
old, it's published since then in the specialized press, and I'm glad to hear
colleagues who explain to me in virtual terms what this sliding thing is .....
so the saying "" no one did not become a prophet in the village to
him .... "" It is confirmed ... the proof that the only subjective element
of this concept (vessel counting) was solved by Swimovate (UK) through a
watch-counter called PoolMate can count the lens, electronically the number of
lobbies (I sit and I wonder ... '' It was such a sucker that Lisa Irlam and her
husband were to invest a few million pounds in this success, counting the vans
is not important for gaining efficiency?) ..... A good night of everything ....
==============
Bibliografie:
